Art / as if / Ideology / Politics

Can Democracy Survive the Internet?

DSC_0004

Over the last years, available storage capacity and processing power has increased tremendously. An increasing part of our lives is based on the internet. Governments have started to use this technology for surveillance as well as manipulation of citizens.

DSC_0003

The justification given for surveillance is security. Some people could do things that are dangerous, so government agencies must find out about their activities in order to suppress those activities. The problem is: what is a dangerous activity, an activity that has to be prevented or suppressed, is a matter of definition. Once the technology is there to find terrorists, for example, the same technology can be used to find any kind of dissenter or any person having characteristics that a government wants to suppress or eradicate, be it racial, political, religious or whatever. So this is not, as we are supposed to think, a security technology; it is a power technology.

DSC_0007

The point is not that good people have nothing to hide. The problem is that a government can redefine who good people are and who bad people are. So which information is something you would better hide can change. The technology is neutral about that.

DSC_0010

In a democracy, power is supposed to be controlled by a system of checks and balances. With the introduction of such surveillance technologies, the balance of powers is shifted, away from the public. It becomes more likely that democracy will flip into dictatorship if governments are in possession of such tools.

DSC_0014

As we have recently learnt, there is also the possibility of manipulation and propaganda. Since more and more of our activities are done online and the internet becomes our main system of access to information, it can also be used to put information in front of our eyes in order to manipulate our opinions. Businesses do this all the time, but if governments in democratic states are starting to do this, the very basis of democracy is being undermined. What we are ending up with is a “guided democracy” that is democratic only on the surface but actually is a subtle form of dictatorship.

DSC_0012

In fact, our opinions are being manipulated already by state propaganda. Governments are spreading an ideology according to which we are under a terrible threat of terrorism. Let me call this ideology “terrorisism”. What we should understand is that the threat of terrorism is minute and does not justify taking away our basic rights. Terrorism does not even show up on the statistics as an important cause of death. It is much more likely you will die from the health effects of lemonade than from terrorism, so the soft drink manufacturers are by far more dangerous than any terrorist organization. If we want to keep our freedom, we will have to live with a certain amount of insecurity. Once the freedom is lost, there will be no security again either.

DSC_0013

Democracy can survive this threat only if we stand up against it. In democracies (and in constitutional monarchies as well) the true sovereign is supposed to be the people. You should be opposed to what these governments and agencies are doing not just because your private life is not their business but because what they are doing is undermining your freedom. What governments and the economic lobbies behind them are currently doing is to stealthily take power out of the sovereign’s hands. The word for this is treason.

DSC_0015

DSC_0016 DSC_0020

DSC_0019

DSC_0001

(The pictures show a mural in Cologne in Ehrenfeld, on the side of Ehrenfeld train station. Click on the images for enlarged versions.).

14 thoughts on “Can Democracy Survive the Internet?

  1. This is the kind of article one is a little bit scared to ‘like’ or comment on. ‘Government’ may very well read it and then I’d be under surveillance next!🙂 Oy! Stunning artwork! I especially like the ‘no sheep entry’ sign.

    • Interestingly, whenever I have written about this topic, (see the articles marked as related) I received very little response from the US although I have lots of US followers. Either people there are too scared or too ideologized already. Quod erat demonstrandum.

      I remember there was another mural with a big eagle at this place before, but after we learnt about what NSA is doing, they change it into this one. I think they did it officially there, you cannot paint a picture of this size illegally. This wall belongs to the railway company of Germany. Probably the allow it because otherwise, you would have taggers and other artists painting there anyway. But I don’t know who the artists are here. I am just beginning to explore the street art/mural/graffiti scene in cologne.

    • what you said. One always thinks someone is watching.
      I stopped to worry about that. I will write and if i can annoy a few people the better, at least they get to know what we think of them

  2. This is a very important piece, and should be in a major internet publication!
    No one should be afraid to speak out/up.
    If we are afraid, all is lost and Big Brother has won!
    I love that you wrapped this around a mural… and a very perfect mural to make your point!

  3. Remarkable post.. you reminded me of Michel Foucault’s book “Surveiller et punir”…
    It seems quite paradoxical that nowadays internet and democracy can be seen as opposites forces!.

    Thanks for sharing. Best wishes, Aquileana😀

    • The topic obviously has connections to the topic of Foucault’s book. His main topic is power. We become permanently visible in what we are doing, like a prisoner in a prison with open cells. We get our information from the net and we communicate through the net, so so can be manipulated. The punishment part is going to come. I wonder what Foucault would have said about these developments.

  4. That’s exactly what I have always thought about Terroricism politics, as you put it. On information technology and the Internet, I agree with you. I’d just add that, in my opinion, no technology is neutral, i. e. it has a range of specific features that actually define it. So it doesn’t just depend on the “good” or the “bad” use that can be done of it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s